Multi-layer Security – Whether It Is Just A Farce For Physical Security Features?

When physical security features are cloned in the public domain, brands are often advised to update new features often with more combinations such as QR codes, CDP-based QR codes or QR codes with foiling. This experimentation is continuing since last multiple decades and problem remains unsolved. However, these security features as temporary solution, as those again gets duplicated and there is no concept of performance liability. Consequently, brand owners are compelled to invest substantial sums in upgrading security features over and over again and investing in manual ground investigation as these features are fundamentally weak leading to increased costs without solving the problem.

/0 Comments/by

Why Performance Or Financial Liability Becoming Litmus Test To Judge Credibility Of Security Features?

Financial Liability: A legal obligation to make payments, such as penalties, or compensation if security features get cloned in the market or in the public domain. It is silent testimony for the robustness and reliability of its security solutions. This commitment not only showcases the company’s confidence in its security features but also reflects solid fundamentals.

By offering financial liability, the company provides clients with a tangible assurance of protection against potential breaches and eventually counterfeiting. This proactive stance not only enhances the company’s credibility but also fosters trust among consumers and partners, distinguishing the brand like Linksmart in the competitive market. If solution provider has hesitation in underwriting performance liability it directly reflects the vulnerability to clonability, really.

Ultimately, financial liability serves as a litmus test for the credibility of security features, demonstrating a company’s unwavering confidence and commitment to safeguard its clients’ interests.

/0 Comments/by