What Are Deficiencies With Traditional Copy Detection Patterns That Many Companies Try To Implements?

Traditional copy detection methods often have critical shortcomings that make them ineffective against sophisticated counterfeiting techniques. These limitations include:

Scan/Resize/Print: Methods like “Scan, Resize, Print” allow duplicates to pass as originals, making them easy to replicate.

Algorithmic Regeneration: Many systems rely on algorithmic regeneration, which can be reverse-engineered or manipulated, enabling counterfeiters to create identical copies.

Digital Cloning:  Mere images of original can be scanned leading to false reporting as originals

Inconclusive Duplicate Detection: Most solutions fail to provide conclusive proof of authenticity, requiring manual ground investigations that increase legal and operational costs.

No Performance Liability: Many providers claim high accuracy but do not take performance liability, leaving companies with ineffective solutions.